Blog
- Details
- Written by: Sandi Laufenberg-Deku
- Category: Blog
- Hits: 97
For many entrepreneurs, starting a new corporation can feel like a dream come true. Maybe you have a business plan in place and you know exactly where you want your company to go. But if you have any investors on board or potential ones, you will need to answer a key question: how do I want my LLC to be managed?
Depending on the number of members you have or if you want to expand your corporation in the future will influence how your business’s day-to-day operations will be controlled. To help you get a handle on how to best run your LLC, we’ll be covering the two management structures LLCs can use: member-managed and manager-managed.
Member-managed LLCs
Arguably the most common choice for LLCs is having each of its members act as an agent of the company. This allows each member to have a voice in the decision-making process of the company. Keep in mind that the amount of voting power each member has may be proportional to their interest in the company. For example, a member that owns 20% of the company could have more say than the member who owns 10% – but that depends on the operating agreement.
Additionally, each member of the LLC can act on behalf of the company. This means they can enter into contracts, borrow funds, and other important decisions. However, these actions still need to be approved by the other members.
What businesses benefit the most?
In cases where each member of the company wants to be involved in the operations of the company (such as a family-owned small business), a member-managed structure will likely be the most beneficial. Businesses that have few members will be able to make decisions with those that have the most valuable input: those managing the businesses’ affairs.
Moreover, this model implies that a person seeking to invest in the corporation will also need to be involved and engaged with the business. This can be a big plus for businesses not wanting to lose control of their livelihood from investors that aren’t involved on the ground.
Manager-managed LLCs
In contrast, member-managed LLCs are those that have specific persons delegated as operational managers. While other members still vote on some matters (e.g. dissolving the company) the day-to-day affairs are managed solely by the appointed individual(s).
Other members of the LLC are not agents of the company as with member-managed LLCs. Instead, the manager is the agent of the corporation and is typically the only individual that can enter into contracts and other financial arrangements for the business.
What businesses benefit the most?
A centralized structure benefits LLCs that have a large number of members/investors that could impede the decision-making process. Even if you own a small business with only a few members, choosing to delegate operational duties to a manager means you can find highly qualified candidates.
LLCs that have a single manager taking control of the business also open up more opportunities for investors, as they are only investing their funds – not their time also. Startups that need to raise capital efficiently would highly benefit from a manager-managed structure.
Wrapping up
To conclude, the key difference between member-managed and manager-managed LLCs is who controls the operations of the business. Member-managed LLCs give all the members the responsibility of running the business, whereas manager-managed LLCs centralized these duties with one individual (or more).
To give you a clearer picture of the differences between the two structures, here’s a short pro/con list for each.
Member-managed LLCs
Pros
- Simple structure
- Investors are operators
- High member control
Cons
- Slower decision-making time
- Difficult to attract investors
- Greater potential for unqualified managers
Manager-Managed LLCs
Pros
- Streamlined decision-making process
- Greater potential for highly qualified managers
- Easy to attract investors
Cons
- Owners have less decision-making power
- Possible higher costs with hiring a manager
- Greater legal complexity (i.e. drafting a specific operating agreement)
- Details
- Written by: Sandi Laufenberg-Deku
- Category: Blog
- Hits: 205
Governments worldwide are embracing real estate tokenization. Here are some highlights.
The Dubai Land Department (DLD) announced a multibillion-dollar-tokenization project to enable fractional ownership of real property in March of this year. This initiative was publicly launched on May 25 and is designed to transform property ownership by 2033, with tokenized assets projected to be valued at around $16 billion. DLD will collaborate with the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA), the Dubai Future Foundation and the UAE Central Bank. DLD’s platform (Prypco Mint) will be integrated with its traditional land-registry systems. As a result of this project, fractional ownership of real estate will be available to UAE residents and investments will start at around $540. International investors will have access in the future.
Bergen County, New Jersey, recently announced the largest blockchain-based-land-record-management project in the United States. It entered into a five-year agreement with Balcony, a blockchain-technology firm, in early June. Over 370,000 deeds, representing around $240 billion in real-property value, will be digitized and migrated onto the Avalanche-blockchain platform supporting decentralized applications, smart contracts and a wide range of use cases, including the tokenization of real-world assets. The project will cover all of the municipalities in the county and serve nearly one million residents. The county anticipates that the project will dramatically reduce deed processing times and streamline real estate transactions. The new system will also be designed to improve municipal revenue collection and enhance public trust in official land records.
Other governments include:
- Teton County, Wyoming was the first county to implement a blockchain-based system for recording land titles and property records with Medici Land Governance, a subsidiary of Overstock.com (MLG) in 2019. The system is accessible through the clerk’s office and online GIS-ownership maps. It does not currently support property transfers or other transactions.
- Baltimore, Maryland. Baltimore’s blockchain land records pilot was launched in December 2023 and is focused on recording the city’s inventory of around 13,000 vacant properties. The pilot aims to streamline transactions, reduce title fraud and accelerate the rehabilitation of vacant homes. It was also developed in partnership with MLG, which is deploying similar systems globally, including in Tulum (Mexico), Liberia and Guyana.
- Details
- Written by: Sandi Laufenberg-Deku
- Category: Blog
- Hits: 233
We have several options for listing tokenized real estate properties in the U.S.
- List a Tokenized Property
- Real Estate Tokenization Service
- DIY Tokenization Kit
- Details
- Written by: Sandi Laufenberg-Deku
- Category: Blog
- Hits: 244
I asked Google AI ABOUT "sec dao requirements"
I got this:
- Details
- Written by: Sandi Laufenberg-Deku
- Category: Blog
- Hits: 184
UPDATED ON OCTOBER 13, 2025
👉🏽 Our Marketplace Goals...
- List our own tokenized listings. WILL BE PUBLISHED VERY SOON.
- Next, we will offer a central place for others to list their tokenized real estate. (Similar to the MLS, but far less grand.) Plus,
- We are currently creating a DIY PROPERTY TOKENIZATION KIT. The purpose of this is to provide easy helps and tools to help property owners to tokenize their real estate.
Please check back in a few weeks. We are currently working on publishing the marketplace to the public.
And thanks for your patience!
- Details
- Written by: Sandi Laufenberg-Deku
- Category: Blog
- Hits: 678
Yes, That's right!!!!
A DIY Kit for Property Tokenization.
By Sandi Laufenberg-Deku
Mar. 20, 2025
Overview
A DIY kit will be developed by our team. It will assist individuals in tokenizing their properties. This initiative aims to simplify the currently complex and pioneering process of property tokenization, making it accessible and affordable - and truly democratized.
- Details
- Written by: Sandi Laufenberg-Deku
- Category: Blog
- Hits: 614
In the context of real estate, "property tokenization" means representing the value of a real estate property or its cash flows as a digital token on a blockchain. This enables fractional ownership and potentially increased liquidity and efficiency. [1] [2]
Here's a more detailed explanation: [1] [3]
What is Tokenization?
Tokenization, in general, is the process of converting the value of an asset (tangible or intangible) into a digital token using blockchain technology. [1] [3]
- Details
- Written by: Sandi Laufenberg-Deku
- Category: Blog
- Hits: 390
Although it is possible to send tokens on a non KYC exchange, Americans should think twice about doing so. It's a huge risk.
A non KYC crypto exchange is a platform that does not require users to complete a "Know Your Customer" (KYC) identity verification process before they can trade or access the platform's services. This means users can trade cryptocurrencies without providing personal information, which offers more privacy and anonymity.
The FBI warns US citizens to engage only with registered crypto platforms that comply with AML and KYC regulations
The FBI warns Americans against using cryptocurrency money transmitting services that are not registered as Money Services Businesses ( MSB ). MSB registration is federal law in the United States. There are also laws requiring MSB's to adhere to anti-money laundering measures, such as KYC.
The FBI also warns that users could lose their money if it is mixed in with money involved in a money-laundering scheme. Read more on the the official FBI Warning,:
"Alert on Cryptocurrency Money Services Businesses" (https://www.ic3.gov/PSA/2024/PSA240425#:~:text=The%20FBI%20warns%20Americans%20against,to%20anti%2Dmoney%20laundering%20requirements. )
Even if you do use non KYC crypto exchanges, most tax offices have released clear guidance that crypto is subject to tax - and any attempt to avoid tax on cryptocurrency is tax evasion and a criminal offense with steep penalties.
Regulatory risks: Governments worldwide are monitoring non-KYC exchanges, and it is just a matter of time before they are made a subject of law. If regulatory agencies identify individuals transacting on these exchanges via their crypto wallet addresses, these users may face stringent legal challenges.